"I've been trying to do the country like Cezanne and having a hell of a time and times getting it a little bit." (Hemingway speaking to Gertrude Stein)
Write like Cezanne Paints - "Big Two-Hearted River" Day 2 - Class Discussion : One of my favorite lessons all year - the class has just spent the previous class (lesson) doing a very close reading of Hemingway's "Big Two-Hearted River" in small groups (that are jigsawed) - and discovered ON THEIR OWN that the story is in fact "really" about a man (Hemingway, Nick, Harold Krebs) coming back, shell-shocked, from war - and relearning to do the things that he loved and found so easy before he left - the methodical, unadorned style of the write displays his needing to rewrite the "manual" of how to live again in the world. Well - today's class completely undermines that interpretation of the story. After going some of the more important lines from the text using a Vertext - we look at four alternate meanings behind "Big Two-Hearted River" - each of which is just as valid as the commonly accepted view of it being the story of a combat veteran experiencing PTSD.
The quiz today is not on "Big Two-Hearted River" - that quiz can be found in the previous lesson and covers both parts. Instead. at the end of the last class, the students were given a copy of Hemingway's story, "Now I Lay Me" to read for today's class - and the quiz is on that.
The majority of the Power Point (found below) is a Vertext (quotes verbatim) from both parts of the story. As with all Vertexts, a student reads the quote (just go down each row, giving each student a chance) and the class responds to the quote through discussion. I have included below a version of that Vertext with my notes on what should (though anything can) come up in discussion - and possible areas for the teacher to make sure get covered. After having done their exhilarating Group Work in the previous class - the students will have a lot to say about these quotes, and that will probably go far beyond what I've included in my notes. The discussion for this part (the Vertext) will present theory #1 - the one that they did in their Group Work, that "Big Two-Hearted River" is about Hemingway (Nick) after he returns from the war. It is a struggle but by taking it in "small bites" he can do it.
Have a student read the first part of this handout aloud (from James R. Mellows's Hemingway - A Life without Consequences). This reiterates the idea of Nick's fishing trip as rehabilitation after the war.
On the Power Point and on this handout are found parts of the text of Hemingway's story, "Now I Lay Me". In that story, the entire fishing trip is just a way for the wounded, disturbed soldier (Hemingway/Nick) to keep from falling asleep by creating a river and its surroundings with such detail that the creation of it - keeps him from falling asleep because he believes that if he does fall asleep he will lose his soul and go mad.
Have students read the paragraphs of this handout aloud. Here they will find a very different backstory (or lack of it) for "Big Two-Hearted River". In his recounting of his years in Paris, Hemingway writes that he wanted to write a story - in the same way that Cezanne painted landscapes - and he found himself doing a pretty good job of it! This is also a good time to bring up the fact that the idea for "Big Two-Hearted River" being the story of a soldier's attempt to return to normalcy only came many years after "In Our Time" was published an in absolutely none of his contemporaneous letters did he even hint that was the kind of story he was writing. The Power Point includes a number of Cezanne landscapes to give the students an idea of what Hemingway may have been aiming for.
The students will be given this theory when they hear the two day lecture on Hemingway's life.
That's a great question. The students came up with a theory to explain the unique nature of "Big Two-Hearted River" in their previous class - the Group Work - and now this lesson undermines (though it doesn't negate) what they came up with. Well - to fully understand that, the best explanation is to show them that nothing is simple in literature and that putting too much stock into the history and biography surrounding a text - may turn out to be a waste of time. For a deeper dive into that idea please see my lesson on Stephen Booth and his lens of literary criticism.
If you have Block scheduling or longer periods, you can spend more time on this. Otherwise, the students have only 4 minutes to get together with like tasked students. The teacher will have to help out here in corralling students together. I usually help them get into two groups of each letter , for instance two groups of A's - the geography of where Nick is in the story. The only thing that the students have to do in these four minutes is to write down what they came up with during their research and share it with others who were looking for the same thing. They should take as good of notes as they can on what others came up with .
Here are the instructions for Part 3 - now that they get back together:
DO YOU SEE A PATTERN? Do you have a possible explanation for Nick's emotions, for the writing style, etc. Remember the iceberg theory. What is under the surface here. Could this story, and how it is presented, be a reaction to something that happens in Nick’s life?
I must say that for 95% of my Group Works - I never walk around and comment on what the groups are talking about, or ask them questions. This Group Work is different. I walk around the room and see what they're coming up with. Surprisingly, most groups get to a beautiful moment of epiphany without any coaxing. They see the burnt out geography of where Nick is as echoing a burnt out battlefield from World War I. They know Nick is based on Ernest Hemingway - and that Hemingway was in the war and wounded there (see "Soldier's Home" - even though it's Harold in the story - not Nick - it really is Nick Adams).
Most groups also put the story somewhere between "The Three-Day Blow" and "Soldier's Home". The prose style aspect can be tricky BUT that's what the wonderful jigsaw aspect of the Group Work is for. Someone will mention that this prose is spare, even for Hemingway - it sounds like a "How To" book or a manual.
Then they wonderfully put it all together: "Big Two-Hearted River" is the story of a shell-shocked veteran - coming home and trying to do the things he used to do - that he used to find pleasure in - but now finds so difficult to do - almost foriegn. He doesn't want to "rush things" and knows that coming up - there will be "plenty of days to fish the swamp" - the swamp being those thoughts from the war that are now too hard to contemplate.
Is there anything better in a classroom than when students use what they came up with (mostly on their own) and get that profound feeling of recognition. On the back of the Group Work are a series of quotes that illustrate exactly what they came up with. When done right - you can literally hear the excitement as the students go through the quotes and see them in a new light. Another reason that it is so important to assign reading for homework. They will see something together today - that they didn't see when they are on their own. The next time they read on their own, they will read differently.
This is a two sided Group Work. The first page are the instructions - and these are very different than our typical Group Work. The teacher needs to be much more involved than usual and help get students into Groups and may even need to help groups that are struggling putting everything together.
Students should be instructed to not look at the flip side of the Group Work until they reach Part IV. Please see the above instructions for all of the details.
There is a notable question on this one - "What is the name of the river in the story "Big Two-Hearted River". Also this quiz counts for 200 points rather than usual 100 given the length of the reading. The reading quiz - like most my quizzes - is designed simply to see if the students did the reading - not, if they understood it. As always, I ask the students to first answer if they did the reading or not - if they didn't - they are expected to not guess.
I try to leave enough room in the margins for students to take extensive notes. If possible, I preferred that students had their own copy of the novel that they could write in. The work, published before 1930, is in the Public Domain.
This is a complete copy of the book - found at the Internet Archive , complete with the Interchapters. The book was originally posted by the Harold B. Lee Library. The work, published before 1930, is in the Public Domain.
Group Works can be done wonderfully using remote "rooms".
I really hate doing two Group Works in a row - but today's is a very different beast. I also don't like going around to the groups while they are working - I figure it's enough that I write the questions - I don't want to start answering them as well. But again - today is different, and I walked around the room for two reasons. First, it's so much fun to see the epiphanies going off - like so much metaphysical popcorn. And - you do sometimes need to steer students in the right direction or preferrably get them to list to what other groups are saying.